The Renters’ Rights Act was introduced with a clear objective: to provide greater security and fairness for tenants. Supporters argued it would create a more balanced rental market, while critics warned it could lead to higher rents, reduced access to housing, and landlords leaving the sector altogether.
Several months on, the reality appears more nuanced. While the legislation has undoubtedly changed behaviours across the market, many of the outcomes differ from its original intent.
Higher Asking Rents, Despite the Ban on Bidding Wars
One of the headline reforms was the prohibition of rental bidding wars, preventing landlords and agents from accepting offers above the advertised rent.
In practice, many landlords have responded by increasing asking rents from the outset. Rather than allowing tenants to bid upwards, landlords are building additional margin into the advertised rental figure. The result is greater pricing uncertainty for tenants and, in some areas, asking rents rising faster than the rents ultimately achieved.
The policy was designed to create transparency, but in some cases it has simply shifted pricing strategies rather than reducing rental costs.
Plan Insurance Brokers can accommodate your Property Owners & Landlord Insurance needs. Just fill in our short call back form, and our professional brokers will be in contact to arrange your insurance.
More Flexible Tenancies, Less Predictable Demand
The move away from fixed-term agreements towards rolling tenancies was intended to give tenants greater freedom to move when their circumstances change.
That flexibility has been welcomed by many renters, but it has also made tenant behaviour harder to predict. Letting agents report more enquiries from prospective tenants who are exploring options earlier and more casually than before. Registrations remain high, but viewings and applications have become less predictable.
For landlords, this can make occupancy planning more difficult. For tenants, increased flexibility may also create a more competitive environment when desirable properties come to market.
Tougher Tenant Referencing and Selection
One unintended consequence of the reforms has been a noticeable tightening of tenant vetting procedures. With the removal of Section 21 and ongoing delays within the court system, landlords now face greater challenges if a tenancy relationship breaks down. As a result, many have become more selective about who they are willing to accept.
Applicants with straightforward employment histories and strong credit profiles often remain unaffected. However, freelancers, self-employed workers, international applicants and those without traditional financial records may find the process more demanding than before.
The legislation was intended to improve tenant security, but for some prospective renters it has raised the barriers to entering the market.
Guarantor Requirements Have Become More Common
Alongside stricter referencing, many landlords have become increasingly reliant on guarantors as an additional layer of protection. In some cases, guarantor requirements now extend beyond applicants who would traditionally have been viewed as higher risk. This can create challenges for younger renters, professionals with non-standard incomes and those whose family support network is limited or based overseas.
The result is that some tenants face greater administrative hurdles despite the reforms being designed to improve accessibility and fairness.
Fears of a Mass Landlord Exodus Have Not Materialised
Prior to implementation, there were widespread concerns that large numbers of landlords would sell their properties and exit the market.
While landlord numbers continue to face pressure from taxation, regulation and rising costs, evidence so far suggests the Renters’ Rights Act has not triggered the mass sell-off many predicted. In some areas, rental supply has even stabilised as landlords who struggled to sell properties have returned them to the lettings market.
That does not mean confidence has returned. Many landlords continue to review their long-term commitment to the sector, particularly where yields are modest and alternative investments offer lower risk.
The Bigger Pressure Remains Economics
Perhaps the most important lesson is that the challenges facing the private rented sector extend far beyond the Renters’ Rights Act itself.
Higher mortgage costs, increased taxation, compliance requirements, maintenance inflation and regulatory change have all contributed to reducing returns for landlords. For many investors, these factors have a greater influence on decision-making than any single piece of legislation.
The Act has altered the operating environment, but underlying economic pressures remain the primary driver of landlord behaviour.
The Renters’ Rights Act has delivered meaningful change, but not always in the way policymakers intended. While tenants have gained greater rights and flexibility, landlords have responded by adjusting pricing strategies, tightening selection criteria and reassessing risk.
The early evidence suggests the legislation has changed behaviour on both sides of the market. Whether it ultimately improves affordability and access to rented housing remains a question that will only be answered over the coming years.